Global Crisis understood via The Parable of “The Elephant & Six blind-men"
- Sudhir Shetty
- Nov 23, 2022
- 5 min read
Updated: Jul 15

Global Crisis Framework (GCF) presents the ‘Full Picture or the Whole Elephant’
representing the complex-pervasive nature of humanity’s predicament characterized by
the Anthropocene.
The Challenge of Coherent Crisis Understanding
It is true that ‘disaster, ‘doom & gloom’ framing aimed at facilitating top-down systemic
transformation or bottom-up behavior change among the masses has failed
spectacularly in the last few decades. But humanity’s failure to diffuse the existential
risks can also be attributed to its fragmented understanding of the nature of the Crisis
thus resulting in a diffused & scattered policy response.
The Parable of the “Blind men & the Elephant” best describes our situation. Citizens,
NGOs, think tanks, IGOs, TNCs, etc. each intentionally/unintentionally define &
prioritizes Global Crisis from their own perspective. Without realizing that the sum total
of all their efforts does not necessarily address the existential threat.
A good example is a blinkered focus on Climate Change & Carbon emissions to the
neglect of all the other vital symptoms of overshoot & Societal Collapse, which reflects
the complete lack of comprehension of the true nature & the root cause of human
existential predicament. (“Whole Elephant”- Societal & Biospheric Collapse)
Only a handful of people having once seen the “Whole Elephant” will accept its
existence rationally and would want to know how to deal with it having now seen it.
The majority will (as an Ostrich would) choose to go into denial mode about the
existence of the “Whole Elephant”. But as the “Whole Elephant” begins to manifest itself
eventually in the real world they will be able to recognize (since they have seen it) unlike
others who may not make any sense of the emerging chaos of the Anthropocene. They
will spring into action, although it might be already too late.
The goal is to work with those minority global populations and prepare them to become
Change Leaders & facilitators when the much-needed ‘political will’ emerges. The
creative reshuffling that comes at a time of crisis (like the pandemic in 2020) must never
be wasted- great transformational ideas must be ready (preferably with the stamp of
tacit approval from critical opinion leaders in the society) when all cards are on the
table.
We actively explore and welcome all ideas from all quarters (global North & South) that
have the potential to reduce humanity’s existential risks and increases its resilience. Our
mission is to emerge as a global knowledge platform & public policy influencer
dedicated to publishing creative strong (eco-centric) sustainability content.
Change-makers today struggle with effective ways to discuss humanity & complex
predicament. Academic and media discourse typically reports events under
disconnected themes—environmental, economic, political, security—missing the
interconnected "big picture"
Humanity's narrow focus on climate change while neglecting other vital symptoms
reflects incomplete comprehension of our existential predicament—whether humanity
should allocate current civilizational resources toward fixing the dominant paradigm or
navigate inevitable collapse and prefigure New Paradigm.
Comprehensive Multi-Dimensional Analysis
The Global Crisis manifests across multiple interconnected dimensions simultaneously:
Ecological Dimension
Climate System Breakdown: Global temperature increase of 1.2°C above pre-
industrial levels; Arctic sea ice declining at 13% per decade; extreme weather
events increasing in frequency and intensity
Biodiversity Collapse: Species extinction rates 100-1,000 times natural
background; 68% decline in vertebrate populations since 1970; insect
populations declining at 2.5% annually
Planetary Boundary Transgressions: 6 of 9 planetary boundaries exceeded;
biogeochemical cycles severely disrupted; ecosystem services degraded across
all biomes
Energetic Dimension
Declining EROI: Conventional oil EROI declined from 100:1 (1930s) to 17:1
(2020s); renewable energy EROI ranges 3:1-45:1; global energy system EROI
approaching minimum thresholds for industrial complexity
Energy Transition Constraints: 100% renewable transition applicable only to
electricity sector (20% of total primary energy); material demands of renewable
transition creating ecological overshoot; intermittency requiring massive storage
infrastructure
Economic Dimension
Financial System Instability: Global debt exceeding $300 trillion (365% of
global GDP); derivatives markets approaching $600 trillion notional value;
inequality reaching historic highs globally
Growth Impossibility: Debt-based monetary systems requiring 3-4% annual
GDP growth minimum; physical impossibility of exponential growth on finite
planet
Technological Dimension
Exponential Technology Risks: AI development outpacing safety protocols;
biotechnology enabling potential pandemic-scale threats; nuclear weapons
proliferation and modernization
Technology Dependence: Global supply chains vulnerable to single-point
failures; critical infrastructure dependent on digital systems; loss of traditional
knowledge and skills
Social and Cultural Dimension
Institutional Degradation: Declining trust in government institutions globally;
democratic backsliding in 73 countries; educational systems failing to address
systemic challenges
Cultural Breakdown: Loss of shared meaning-making frameworks; community
fragmentation and social isolation; mental health crises across all demographics
Geopolitical Dimension
Great Power Competition: US-China strategic rivalry across all domains;
NATO-Russia tensions escalating nuclear risks; competition for critical resources
intensifying
Governance Failures: Multilateral institutions unable to address global
challenges; nation-state system inadequate for planetary problems; international
law enforcement mechanisms weakening
The Systemic Nature of Crisis Convergence
These dimensions are not separate challenges but manifestations of singular systemic
breakdown. Key interconnections include:
Ecological-Economic Feedback Loops: Environmental degradation undermines
economic productivity while growth imperatives accelerate ecological destruction.
Energy-Social Dependencies: Declining net energy availability reduces societal
complexity while social systems require increasing energy for maintenance.
Technology-Governance Lags: Exponential technology development outpaces
institutional adaptation capacity while governance systems lack technical literacy.
These interconnections explain why fragmented approaches consistently fail—they
address isolated symptoms while systemic drivers remain unchanged.
The Movement Convergence Moment
After four decades of parallel development, the world's leading sustainability
movements have reached convergence point. Each movement has developed crucial
insights:
Bioregional Organization (7,000 participants in 2024 7-Generation Earth Summit):
Design School for Regenerating Earth with planetary learning network.
Permaculture Design: 2+ million practitioners globally with proven resilience-building
methodology and energy descent pathway analysis.
Commons Governance: Updated frameworks with legal innovations and global
commons movements documentation.
Post-Growth Economics: Major Lancet publication (2024) on post-growth wellbeing
with growing academic acceptance and policy framework development.
Convergence Indicators: Timing synchronicity with all movements accelerating
simultaneously; shared understanding that incremental change insufficient; framework
gaps with each movement seeking broader integration; growing institutional acceptance
across all four movements.
The Missing Meta-Framework: While each movement excels in specific domains,
none provides comprehensive, collapse-aware framework necessary for civilizational
transition. GCF fills this gap while honoring and integrating insights from all movements
alongside rich Global South theoretical traditions.
The Need for Systemic Integration
The Global Crisis Framework provides systematic tools for recognizing the "whole
elephant" common language for discussing complex realities, criteria for distinguishing
transformative from superficial responses, pathways for building consensus across
diverse perspectives, and implementation strategies addressing root causes rather than
symptoms.
Once anyone "sees" the whole elephant, it becomes difficult to "un-see" it,
regardless of initial denial. This positions framework-aware "Generalist"
Changemakers as essential guides when broader recognition emerges and
political will for transformation develops.
Comments